The Cyprus Property Problem
Posted: 14 May 2012 21:32
Hi,
I've had a few rants recently but I'm still struggling to understand what the actual problem is. This is my understanding;
The developer borrows money from the bank to buy land/build properties. A title deed is issued for the land but I understand that this is inseparable from anything built on the land. The bank lodge a claim to that title as they have a charge over the land as well (and anything built on it). Therefore, at this stage, the developer has his name on the title for the land and the bank has a 'second charge' in affect on that title. So, along comes purchaser, to the bank who allows them to borrow. The security for the bank is that they still have a second charge over the land. I think this is right!
So, at this point does the purchaser have any claim over the title for the land? I assume not. This practice, I understand, is not illegal in Cyprus but maybe contrary to EU legislation and this is what the long running legal dispute is about.
If the developer stops paying their loan to the bank the bank can take the land off the developer and sell it to recoup their loss. Again, I think this is right?? If this happened then the purchaser lose their homes. Those who paid in full for the property lose everything and those with a mortgage lose whatever they have put in so far but will not have to pay the remainder as they no longer have the property. Please correct me if I am wrong.
I read recently that many developers are not paying their loans. If this is the case, have any banks taken the land back and booted out the occupants of the properties sat on it?
If some developers are not paying their loans why do the banks allow this as I'm sure they wouldn't allow me not to pay my loan.
What is the specific legal battle? Is it the lawyers fault or the banks fault?
I still cannot believe that an EU country is allowed to do this. I am paying for something that I don't own. The title may never be issued unless the developer pays back their entire loan for that titled piece of land, which according to what I have read is very unlikely!
Does anyone have an educated guess and what may happen? I've heard that similar things happen in other EU countries but what was the outcome? How many other countries operate their title deed system this way?
Is there any will within Cyprus to change this system?
What is the timescale with the EU ruling?
I appreciate there are a number of questions but please keep the answers as easy to understand as possible. Just when I think I understand the problem I read something that makes me think I don't!
Janner
I've had a few rants recently but I'm still struggling to understand what the actual problem is. This is my understanding;
The developer borrows money from the bank to buy land/build properties. A title deed is issued for the land but I understand that this is inseparable from anything built on the land. The bank lodge a claim to that title as they have a charge over the land as well (and anything built on it). Therefore, at this stage, the developer has his name on the title for the land and the bank has a 'second charge' in affect on that title. So, along comes purchaser, to the bank who allows them to borrow. The security for the bank is that they still have a second charge over the land. I think this is right!
So, at this point does the purchaser have any claim over the title for the land? I assume not. This practice, I understand, is not illegal in Cyprus but maybe contrary to EU legislation and this is what the long running legal dispute is about.
If the developer stops paying their loan to the bank the bank can take the land off the developer and sell it to recoup their loss. Again, I think this is right?? If this happened then the purchaser lose their homes. Those who paid in full for the property lose everything and those with a mortgage lose whatever they have put in so far but will not have to pay the remainder as they no longer have the property. Please correct me if I am wrong.
I read recently that many developers are not paying their loans. If this is the case, have any banks taken the land back and booted out the occupants of the properties sat on it?
If some developers are not paying their loans why do the banks allow this as I'm sure they wouldn't allow me not to pay my loan.
What is the specific legal battle? Is it the lawyers fault or the banks fault?
I still cannot believe that an EU country is allowed to do this. I am paying for something that I don't own. The title may never be issued unless the developer pays back their entire loan for that titled piece of land, which according to what I have read is very unlikely!
Does anyone have an educated guess and what may happen? I've heard that similar things happen in other EU countries but what was the outcome? How many other countries operate their title deed system this way?
Is there any will within Cyprus to change this system?
What is the timescale with the EU ruling?
I appreciate there are a number of questions but please keep the answers as easy to understand as possible. Just when I think I understand the problem I read something that makes me think I don't!
Janner