Immpovable propert law 1993
Posted: 29 Sep 2011 17:15
Hi wondering if you could help
Our complex is in the difficult situation where the developer has withdrawn their management agreement and therefore their management of the complex before the title deedshave been issued, We have a minimum wait of another 2 years , although most of us bought in 2002.
I have read the primary legislation "the dreaded immovable property ect law of 1993" and I am quite happy that we should use the 'standard regulations' in the appendix to make sure we keep the complex on an even keel.
However, I have read all the posts on this forum and others and no body makes mention of Table B as defined in clause 3(2) of the Appendix. I am happy that the said table A should detail our voting rights and voting rights alone. But I am unable to find an examples on how Table B is used, The Table clearly implies that you can differentiate between common services and Common expenses,although the note at the bottom of the page is contrary to the table.
Can you point me in the right direction including any test cases ( in English)that might help with this dilemma.
Also one last thing as we do not have our tittle deeds am I correct in my assumption that although we have a well run and well functioning owners committee if one of the owners wanted to be difficult the committee is unable to sue as a legal entity
Thanks Tom
Our complex is in the difficult situation where the developer has withdrawn their management agreement and therefore their management of the complex before the title deedshave been issued, We have a minimum wait of another 2 years , although most of us bought in 2002.
I have read the primary legislation "the dreaded immovable property ect law of 1993" and I am quite happy that we should use the 'standard regulations' in the appendix to make sure we keep the complex on an even keel.
However, I have read all the posts on this forum and others and no body makes mention of Table B as defined in clause 3(2) of the Appendix. I am happy that the said table A should detail our voting rights and voting rights alone. But I am unable to find an examples on how Table B is used, The Table clearly implies that you can differentiate between common services and Common expenses,although the note at the bottom of the page is contrary to the table.
Can you point me in the right direction including any test cases ( in English)that might help with this dilemma.
Also one last thing as we do not have our tittle deeds am I correct in my assumption that although we have a well run and well functioning owners committee if one of the owners wanted to be difficult the committee is unable to sue as a legal entity
Thanks Tom